<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snowboard Review: 09-10 Lib Tech Dark Series C2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shayboarder.com/2009/02/snowboard-review-09-10-lib-tech-dark-series-c2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shayboarder.com/2009/02/snowboard-review-09-10-lib-tech-dark-series-c2.html</link>
	<description>The World of Snowboarding Through Fembot Eyes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:45:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lukasls</title>
		<link>http://www.shayboarder.com/2009/02/snowboard-review-09-10-lib-tech-dark-series-c2.html/comment-page-1#comment-12100</link>
		<dc:creator>lukasls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shayboarder.plan81.com/2009/02/snowboard-review-09-10-lib-tech-dark-series-c2.html#comment-12100</guid>
		<description>Hey, is that true that with Magna you should reduce the lenght of the board by 4 cms with respect to snowboarder height in comparison to the regular board without this feature?
Other thing is what bindings would you recommend for this board?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, is that true that with Magna you should reduce the lenght of the board by 4 cms with respect to snowboarder height in comparison to the regular board without this feature?<br />
Other thing is what bindings would you recommend for this board?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yaeler</title>
		<link>http://www.shayboarder.com/2009/02/snowboard-review-09-10-lib-tech-dark-series-c2.html/comment-page-1#comment-1794</link>
		<dc:creator>yaeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shayboarder.plan81.com/2009/02/snowboard-review-09-10-lib-tech-dark-series-c2.html#comment-1794</guid>
		<description>Nice blog site. And nice review too. &lt;br/&gt;Snowboarding is the best. Let&#039;s just hope that Global Warming will end. So we can save this sport.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.risenmagazine.com/feature/gretchen-bleiler-cool-warmth-winter&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gretchen Bleiler Interview&lt;/a&gt;: The Cool Warmth of Winter.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.risenmagazine.com/feature/tom-delonge-life-after-blink&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Blink 182 Tom&lt;/a&gt;: Life After Blink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice blog site. And nice review too. <br />Snowboarding is the best. Let&#8217;s just hope that Global Warming will end. So we can save this sport.</p>
<p><a HREF="http://www.risenmagazine.com/feature/gretchen-bleiler-cool-warmth-winter" REL="nofollow">Gretchen Bleiler Interview</a>: The Cool Warmth of Winter.<br /><a HREF="http://www.risenmagazine.com/feature/tom-delonge-life-after-blink" REL="nofollow">Blink 182 Tom</a>: Life After Blink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.shayboarder.com/2009/02/snowboard-review-09-10-lib-tech-dark-series-c2.html/comment-page-1#comment-1791</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shayboarder.plan81.com/2009/02/snowboard-review-09-10-lib-tech-dark-series-c2.html#comment-1791</guid>
		<description>man, i can&#039;t wait to try this board out.  although, I&#039;m curious what makes you say that it&#039;s no longer &quot;freestyle focused&quot;.  is it just because it&#039;s stiffer?  is it more directional than it has been in the past?  my last board was the Dark Series from a few years ago (before banana and magnetraction) and now I ride a GNU Rider&#039;s Choice BTX.  I&#039;d like to combine the best of both.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My biggest worry is that I tested 2 different Neversummer boards this year with the recurve, and i felt like the camber on the ends made them more catchy (even more than regular camber, which itself is more catchy than BTX).  I hope when you say the two ride different you mean the lib tech is less catchy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man, i can&#8217;t wait to try this board out.  although, I&#8217;m curious what makes you say that it&#8217;s no longer &#8220;freestyle focused&#8221;.  is it just because it&#8217;s stiffer?  is it more directional than it has been in the past?  my last board was the Dark Series from a few years ago (before banana and magnetraction) and now I ride a GNU Rider&#8217;s Choice BTX.  I&#8217;d like to combine the best of both.  </p>
<p>My biggest worry is that I tested 2 different Neversummer boards this year with the recurve, and i felt like the camber on the ends made them more catchy (even more than regular camber, which itself is more catchy than BTX).  I hope when you say the two ride different you mean the lib tech is less catchy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

