Location: Mammoth, CA
Snow Conditions: Hardpacked to softpacked groomed runs.
Setup: I rode the Lib Tech Magic Banana with my Union Team bindings and Vans Veil Boots size 8.
Size: 157cm.
First Impression: It rips up the mountain with all mountain freestyle flare to it.
Weight: average
Flex: The Banana Magic is that all mountain freestyle board that is on the stiffer side for freestyle but that’s what makes it handle the whole mountain and take on the park. Lib Tech rates it as a 6-7 on their scale. Both longitudinally and torsional it’s about the same in flex but BTX on the board makes those butters/presses still doable. The stability allowed it to ride the mountain comfortably but also good pop for taking into the park. The Banana Magic is enhanced BTX which means banana rocker between your feet and flat from beginning of inserts to contact points with a numerically enhanced sidecut.
Turning: The Banana Magic doesn’t ride like your typical BTX snowboard, it actually handles carving and turns better with the enhanced sidecut. Very quick to turn and fast riding on edge, it could rally through carves on the mountain on short and long radius turns. Heelside turns are easer with the sidecut. Even on my notes, I raved about the quick responsive edge to edge control it delivered. It had no problems holding an edge.
Stable: On the mountain, the Banana Magic doesn’t waiver when it comes to freeriding. It delivers a stable ride, absorbs bumpy terrain and gives you an all mountain snowboard wherever you ride. It gripped the conditions and held an edge through the riding I took it through.
Pop: Really easy for popping ollies and playing around with despite being on the stiffer flex side. It’s still very much a playful board. More playful than the attack banana but less playful than the skate banana. It’s that board that freeriders can use in park but also cruise the mountain with. I found it great on the jumps in Forest Trail and just a blast to ride.
Switch: The magic banana is a true twin and this time when I rode it, it rode like a true twin and felt the same regular or switch.
Overall Impression: The Magic Banana can handle it all. If you freeride but want a park board too, this board can ride the whole mountain without feeling like it can’t handle it. The cruising and freeriding, it feels stable and handles carving. Then in the park, it offers up good pop and the BTX gives it playfulness on the nose/tail.
Shay’s Honesty Box: The first time I rode the Magic Banana, I liked that it was a freerider’s skate banana. The playfulness and freestyle flavor on a board that can handle the mountain without being loose and squirrely. It’s still that board that I rode the first time and just as fun to keep riding.
Ready to buy? Head over to evo for the Lib Tech Banana Magic or shop their full line of Lib Tech snowboards
On Snow Photo
Lib Tech Attack Banana description
Review Disclosure: I rode this board at the WWSRA Mammoth on-snow. Please be aware boards may change, this review was done in February 2011.
June 11th, 2011 at 4:11 pm
any idea on the price range for the banana magic? and how would you compare it to rome’s reverb rocker?
June 11th, 2011 at 8:03 pm
Woah! They’ll have a 154 next year. That’s awesome!
June 12th, 2011 at 8:24 am
Cool review sounds a fun board for everything… Do you know what are the waist of the new size 161cm? thanks
June 13th, 2011 at 8:40 am
Sounds good to me! Great review.
I just stumbled across an opportunity to sell my 156 skate banana to a friend, and to buy an 11/12 157 Magic, which I seized, but was concerned that I would miss my Skate Banana.
I’m about 6 foot 2, and weigh nearly 200 lbs, my banana was a 156 (short for playfulness and trees), which seemed fine, but I did find that it washed out at speed and on hard carves, which I felt had more to do with sidecut and stiffness than length (like tapered pow boards, bananas really are designed to be ridden short, whether the stubborn customers accept it or not). As reference, my hard-carving, fresh groom, all mountain board is a Never Summer Titan 59 (I’m on the East Coast, so I kept it short).
Shay’s description sounds completely bang-on. I can’t shake that this is going to be my everyday board (ice, old powder, spring conditions, man-made), and that my Titan and pow boards will only come out for very specific conditions (fresh groom and highspeed, and fresh pow, respectively), particularly because my skate banana was becoming my everyday board, despite the wash out.
Just thought the info above would be useful for anyone considering the Magic, or coming off a Skate Banana, thinking it was too unpredictable for all mountain.
In my mind, a Magic and a powder board could be all anyone would really need (I think there is nothing like a heavily-tapered directional board for surfy, non-exhausting pow riding, and for me (no matter what Mervin says), the best are the pre-S camber Butron Fish (I know, I hate to admit that Burton has something right, but just like their bindings, they have nailed something there).
Shay – any thoughts on the price? I think it’s worth it. Premium price for a premium board – tons of R&D and unique/expenisive, environmentally-friendlier ingredients.
Trust Mervin!
June 13th, 2011 at 9:22 am
Hi Peterborough,
I mostly agree of what you wrote… I do have a 2008 Lando Lib Tech 160 (BTX version).
I used to have an Fish 156, 2005-2006 , that was pretty good at that time …
But like you, I am in the East Coast (Icy slopes) and to me, even if S camper classic Fish looks good for powder, it is still not as good as Magne-Traction (BTX, C2)… in my opinion for our condition…
Shay since you rode the Lando 2008 (BTX) 160 how will you compare to the Magic Banana 157? ( I know better base (Sintered) and more Banana) but both are BTX and have the same waist 254mm but completely different sidecut (8.75m for Lando vs around 7m I think)… What is your opinion on this, if you do remember? thanks
June 13th, 2011 at 5:46 pm
Francis, no word on specs yet but I’ll see what I can find out. I’d have to ride the lando again, that’s a bit ago for sure and a lot of boards in between.
Peter, price is $696.96. Great to hear your experience with the boards as well!
June 15th, 2011 at 6:21 am
Hey Francis,
Yeah, don’t get me wrong, a Fish is a dedicated pow board, they do ok on non-deep, fresh snow, but far from great. If I had to go multi-purpose pow board to compliment a banana (which undeniably is the all-conditions killer, IMO), I would think Rome Notch (pre-S camber) or Malolo. Just more opinions, you never know, someone might find them helpful.
Thanks for the details on price Shay, wow, that is a lot of money. They (Mervinc people I have spoken to) have said the Magic is the poor man’s Cygnus X-1 (poor just meaning non-rich, in this case) – this might be true. If I think of it, I will post some on-hill thoughts in December or January.
October 12th, 2011 at 5:46 pm
Anything change from last year to this year? This year on their website they are saying it is a c2 board and a 7 side cut radius. Last year they didn’t list the radius or the board profile.
I am wondering if things changed or if they just happened to show it this year.
October 13th, 2011 at 6:06 pm
JS, good question. I asked a friend at Mervin about the change in titles/descriptions. According to them the board is still enhanced banana so more liked a rockered out camber. The catalog says BTX, the board said Banana Technology so it’s weird the website now says C2BTX. It could have a tinge of C2 and that’s why Mervin changed it up. Who knows, Mervin tends to play around with board technology a lot.
October 14th, 2011 at 7:17 am
Thanks for asking! But that just made my decision that much harder. I can get the 2011 magic and 2012 TRS for the same price. I have been back and forth a million times and can’t decide which to get. I mostly just free ride so the magic sounds better, but I am worried it will be too aggressive of a board. There are times where I just want to relax down the mountain.
October 14th, 2011 at 9:32 am
JS go than for Magic… better base (sintered) and construction (Balsac) damping , light… plus on both you can Relaxe too in my opinion but Magic will be more playfull… It is on my list for 2012 too
October 17th, 2011 at 11:46 am
¡Great review! Thanks. Im thinking on getting a Banana Magic this winter but I cant decide which size. Im 170 pounds and ride mostly groomers and some freeride, I never do park. Any help? Thanks!
November 10th, 2011 at 12:07 pm
JS, my understanding is that the Magic is the board for you. I ride like you most of the time, and chose this board for just that. The confusion around what type of banana may be related to patent issues, I’m not sure. My understanding is that this board sits right between btx and C2btx. My board says enhanced BTX, I believe. I have still yet to figure out the sidecut (and I physically posses the board, it’s just that the mtx edges make it hard to discern).
Frank, I weigh 195, am pretty tall, and went with the 157. Yes, that’s a short board, but I think this is a situation like Burton’s Fish – they really are meant to be sized down. I will say, though, this is not my charger board, I have a longer board for those sorts of days. When the board first came out, I believe the 157 was the biggest (or at least biggest non-wide) they had, I think perhaps there are more (and larger) sizes now just to satisfy people’s habit – many of us never ride anything outside of a 2-3 cm window, which if you think about it, is really limiting.
November 10th, 2011 at 12:07 pm
JS, my understanding is that the Magic is the board for you. I ride like you most of the time, and chose this board for just that. The confusion around what type of banana may be related to patent issues, I’m not sure. My understanding is that this board sits right between btx and C2btx. My board says enhanced BTX, I believe. I have still yet to figure out the sidecut (and I physically posses the board, it’s just that the mtx edges make it hard to discern).
Juanjo/Frank, I weigh 195, am pretty tall, and went with the 157. Yes, that’s a short board, but I think this is a situation like Burton’s Fish – they really are meant to be sized down. I will say, though, this is not my charger board, I have a longer board for those sorts of days. When the board first came out, I believe the 157 was the biggest (or at least biggest non-wide) they had, I think perhaps there are more (and larger) sizes now just to satisfy people’s habit – many of us never ride anything outside of a 2-3 cm window, which if you think about it, is really limiting.
November 10th, 2011 at 12:08 pm
Oops, sorry for the duplicate post, I editted last minute.
December 1st, 2011 at 4:48 am
Hello all,
big thanks for your review you’ve push to buy a magic she’s in the plane actually!
I’ve few questions about which bindings are better for this board.
I’ve buy the Northwave Decade SL boots, but i can’t make a choice for which bindings to take. I hesitate between Rome targa, Union Force, K2 Cinch CTS and Drake (dunno wich model its just because that’s the same brand of my boots)but dunno wich one to choose.
So what do you think about these bindings, because i’ve take the magic for her polyvalence freeride/freestyle to enjoy and play on backcountry, flat and pist.
Thanks in advance and sorry if i’ve a bad grammar (from france).
Best regards
December 3rd, 2011 at 9:36 pm
Pik, really depends on your personal preference for binding response/flex. The Targa is stiffer more freeriding specific but has adjustable ankle flex straps, Force is more all mountain freestyle, Cinch gives you quick entry. So depends on your preferences.
December 5th, 2011 at 9:59 am
I’m looking for a mid/stiff flex qui a good response, i final focus on Flux Sf45 Rome Targa and Union Force SL but i can’t take a decision kinda boring. i plan to ride 50% on pist 30% backcountry 20% flat but no park, si it’s for that i focus on freeride to all montain bindings but what do you think about the flux SF45 Union Force SL and rome targa, any preferences?
December 5th, 2011 at 5:38 pm
Pikz,
but all of the bindings you mention above are good, my feeling is Union is a tad lighter (just a tad like less than 90gr a pair) where Flux got better cushing pading for comfy… Bindings are getting like boots now… it is all about fits, comfy and preference 
If I can put comments… all 3 bindings are on my list too with the addition of K2 Company maybe too… Basically what I found in 2011-2012… a bit like all the choices of reverse camber and camber tech on the market, binding also have an evolution… regard as the weights differences between some companies also is about now more focus on Footbed… where Flux and Union go for natural auto canted style feeling (Burton do it too) underfoot (softer footbed in some area) so you control the pressing by your body… other goes like Rome, Ride, K2 with some canted footbed from 1.5 to even 4 degrees… Personally I do ride crazy duck style (24 stance and over with -9 to 18 front) so I do like canted so far it is less pressing on my older knees now
December 14th, 2011 at 2:11 am
I’m looking at the 2012 Magic Banana as my only all-mountain board. I’m 5’9 and 170lbs. Most of my riding is in Japan so need something that floats well. I’m sold on this board, but can’t decide on 157 or dropping down to 154, any thoughts?
December 14th, 2011 at 7:50 pm
Mark, sweet on getting the banana magic! I would definitely stick with the 157, 154 is small for your weight and won’t float as well as the 157.
December 14th, 2011 at 9:31 pm
Yes Mark
but this is me, I do like longer snowboard for fast carving and float…
go for 157 … with 7 Meters of radius, it will be very agile and more float and better carving… even me and also depending of weight and boot size I am sometimes considering 161
Fun thing with Banana Magic is that all size does have 7 meters of radius….
January 2nd, 2012 at 6:55 pm
Finally Rode the Magic! As promised, my thoughts:
First day on my Magic in Montana (Big Sky). I’m just over 6 feet tall, and weigh around 200 lb. As mentioned above, I ride in the East most of the time (esp. in the trees), and am coming from a skate banana 156, so I chose a 157. Today’s conditions were packed and fresh powder. An important thing to note in my mind – this board when originally released had very few size options, I don’t even know if it went bigger than 157, my understanding is that the folks at Mervin really feel that banana and magnetraction allow riders to undersize their boards (though customers are hard to convince, after years of being told that only long boards provide control at speed and float).
My opinion is that this board can be ridden shorter than what most of us are accustomed to riding (bear in mind that when the powder is deeper than 6 inches, I switch to a powder board).
The bottom line – I feel like this is a more responsive, predictable and versatile skate banana (which is just what I was looking for). I did not suffer the washout that my skate banana often presented while riding the magic today (to be honest, I had to relearn my heel-carves, as they were so much more in control than what the banana could provide). This board sits somewhere between standard banana and c2, I could not make it catch, but it was easier to hold an edge than my old skate banana. If I am not mistaken, this board is also a bit stiffer than an equivalent banana.
If you can afford it, and it suits you, it’s a real doozy!
January 3rd, 2012 at 10:17 am
Thanks Peterborough,
And Shay, very appreciated your reviews…
I am now more and more interested about Banana Magic 157… Since I do have Phoenix Lando 160, 2008…. Looking for something more playful, but capable to charge once a while and a good all around (and not loose to remplace the Lando)… What will be the competitor of Banana Magic in case I want to look outside of Mervin product? Do you think NS Heritage 158? Any other snowboard model in your opinion that will be competitor? Thanks
January 3rd, 2012 at 8:03 pm
Peter, awesome feedback! Thanks for sharing your experience!
Frank, Heritage would be a good choice. Have you tried TBT yet?
January 4th, 2012 at 10:24 am
Hi Shay,
No I been curious about TBT but never tried… are you thinking about The Jam as a competitor of Banana Magic?
January 9th, 2012 at 1:15 pm
Frank, you should definitely try it. Really handles on carving for the mountain but still pretty playful boards.
February 3rd, 2012 at 12:32 pm
Bought this board in December. fucking slays everything in its path. ice, hard pack, trees, deep pow, mogles, jumps, doesn’t matter. even did alright on the jibber jabbers. Hold on cause this puppy has some serious NOS. it likes to go fast, really fast. Way more stable than most
boards out there, especially when you get a wide (158 wide for me). I highly recommend getting this stick for anyone looking for one ride to do it all. P.s. Stiff bindings will make this thing go anywhere you want it. Zigs and zags everywhere.
February 12th, 2012 at 1:25 pm
Shay which board is stiffer the magic or coda? I want a do it all board, but mostly freeride. I cant decide between the magic and coda.
February 13th, 2012 at 2:00 pm
Peterborough:
I am agree for havier pow… specific pow board like taper board allways no brainer or maybe BTX (like Gnu Dirty Pillow) or La Nina C1…
How do you like carving fast with the Magic? did you found any trade off with your NS titan?
Shay:
I am getting interesting about TBT … I can see that in 2013, even other company like Elan or Rome (Crossfit) will have a variation of TBT… What do you thing about Rome Cross Fit with Quick Rip for 2013? I do not like the grafic but technology seem to be there… thanks
February 16th, 2012 at 10:46 pm
I own a T Rice. Love the board, but want a more all mountain board. Is there a large enough difference between the Magic and Rice to add to the quiver?
February 21st, 2012 at 12:21 pm
I mean the new Rome Crossrocket 2013 not Crossfit sorry
instead of TBT?
February 21st, 2012 at 10:09 pm
Francis, I haven’t tried it yet unfortunately. But definitely will try to get on it.
Pete, do you think you want more playful or more mountain?
February 22nd, 2012 at 7:37 pm
I guess just slightly more play in the deck. I still like a stiffer board, but want more play than the T Rice. Rode the TRS and thought it was way too soft.