define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Snowboard Review: 09-10 Arbor Coda	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/02/snowboard-review-09-10-arbor-coda.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/02/snowboard-review-09-10-arbor-coda.html</link>
	<description>The World of Snowboarding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 02:39:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: KimChi		</title>
		<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/02/snowboard-review-09-10-arbor-coda.html/comment-page-1#comment-1864</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KimChi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shayboarder.plan81.com/2009/02/snowboard-review-09-10-arbor-coda.html#comment-1864</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I jumped on a NightTrain (described to me by the rep as a &quot;softer&quot; Crossbow) and was surprised at how stiff it was relative to how the rep described it (a little stiffer than average).  So based I&#039;m thinking the Arbor guys&#039; definition of stiff is a bit skewed... I&#039;m stoked to try out one of their &quot;softer&quot; boards, though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I jumped on a NightTrain (described to me by the rep as a &#8220;softer&#8221; Crossbow) and was surprised at how stiff it was relative to how the rep described it (a little stiffer than average).  So based I&#8217;m thinking the Arbor guys&#8217; definition of stiff is a bit skewed&#8230; I&#8217;m stoked to try out one of their &#8220;softer&#8221; boards, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: hoon		</title>
		<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/02/snowboard-review-09-10-arbor-coda.html/comment-page-1#comment-1858</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hoon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shayboarder.plan81.com/2009/02/snowboard-review-09-10-arbor-coda.html#comment-1858</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[yes a good idea but not to be a stickler, but then this doesn&#039;t allow for any toe/heel adjustment for those with bigger feet (assuming there is no heelcup adjustment in the binding). yah i&#039;m geeking out right now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes a good idea but not to be a stickler, but then this doesn&#8217;t allow for any toe/heel adjustment for those with bigger feet (assuming there is no heelcup adjustment in the binding). yah i&#8217;m geeking out right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marc		</title>
		<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/02/snowboard-review-09-10-arbor-coda.html/comment-page-1#comment-1857</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shayboarder.plan81.com/2009/02/snowboard-review-09-10-arbor-coda.html#comment-1857</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yikes good point hoon. The solution to this is to turn the disks on your bindings 90 degrees. This allows you to slide the bindings out another half an inch or so on each foot. That&#039;s how I managed to get a 26+ inch stance on my Venture Zephyr (with Burton CO2 bindings). So this technique will probably get you a 25.4 (or .5) inch stance on the Coda.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes good point hoon. The solution to this is to turn the disks on your bindings 90 degrees. This allows you to slide the bindings out another half an inch or so on each foot. That&#8217;s how I managed to get a 26+ inch stance on my Venture Zephyr (with Burton CO2 bindings). So this technique will probably get you a 25.4 (or .5) inch stance on the Coda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: hoon		</title>
		<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/02/snowboard-review-09-10-arbor-coda.html/comment-page-1#comment-1853</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hoon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shayboarder.plan81.com/2009/02/snowboard-review-09-10-arbor-coda.html#comment-1853</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[a 24.4 (or is it .5) inch max stance is a WTF? even if it is a freeride board, it&#039;s not the year 1998. companies need to ensure that boards have at least a 25 inch max stance as everyone&#039;s running larger and larger stances. stepping off my soap box now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a 24.4 (or is it .5) inch max stance is a WTF? even if it is a freeride board, it&#8217;s not the year 1998. companies need to ensure that boards have at least a 25 inch max stance as everyone&#8217;s running larger and larger stances. stepping off my soap box now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>