define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true); define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true); Comments on: YES Snowboards 2009-2010 https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/05/yes-snowboards-2009-2010.html The World of Snowboarding Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:21:32 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2 By: Maniagr https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/05/yes-snowboards-2009-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-72960 Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:21:32 +0000 http://shayboarder.plan81.com/2009/05/yes-snowboards-2009-2010.html#comment-72960 Is there any yes board 158 with red color on the bindings side and the black on the other side???The oposite colors of this board that you talking about?

]]>
By: JMT Colorado https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/05/yes-snowboards-2009-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-2583 Tue, 26 May 2009 19:11:51 +0000 http://shayboarder.plan81.com/2009/05/yes-snowboards-2009-2010.html#comment-2583 Hey, for anonymus looking for a wide… The boards, especially the 158 and 162 are wider than than your normal 58 and 62. The 58 will most likely fit at least a size 11 and the 62 should fit almost everything else. Remember that one of the main goals of boot manufacturers is to create a lower profile boot. This helps to eliminate the need for wide boards. In many cases like 32, Salomon, Burton and Northwave, a size 11 boot from this season is most likely the length of a size 9 or 10 five years ago. Unless 3 feet of fresh is all you ride everyday, downsizing the size of your boot and the width of your board will help increase the response of your board. Making it easier and quicker to set the edge and control the boards on tight, quick turns. I all I know is that no matter what size boot you have, you will love these boards. They have very similar edging characteristics to standard camber. As always though, toe drag is never good, so it is still a good idea to check your boot on the board.

]]>
By: Shayboarder https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/05/yes-snowboards-2009-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-2471 Tue, 12 May 2009 01:22:00 +0000 http://shayboarder.plan81.com/2009/05/yes-snowboards-2009-2010.html#comment-2471 Hey Johnny, most companies are taking the reverse camber into their own hands and seeing how it does. NS’s way isn’t the set in stone way to do it. Atomic did a similiar design to YES, but there’s was camber then flat under the bindings and YES does camber then rockered to the tip and tail, so companies are really testing it and seeing if it works…by multiple designs before it even gets to the public. YES’s version and how it rode I just put up the review for, since I’ve ridden the atomic’s prototype…this had a similiar feel but not your typical rocker board at all.

]]>
By: Johnny https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/05/yes-snowboards-2009-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-2440 Sat, 09 May 2009 09:23:00 +0000 http://shayboarder.plan81.com/2009/05/yes-snowboards-2009-2010.html#comment-2440 maybe its just because I really dig Neversummer boards but whats the use of cambering a board totally the opposite way than NS does…???????

]]>
By: Shayboarder https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/05/yes-snowboards-2009-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-2425 Fri, 08 May 2009 03:41:00 +0000 http://shayboarder.plan81.com/2009/05/yes-snowboards-2009-2010.html#comment-2425 hmm check for it Monday

]]>
By: Anonymous https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/05/yes-snowboards-2009-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-2424 Fri, 08 May 2009 01:39:00 +0000 http://shayboarder.plan81.com/2009/05/yes-snowboards-2009-2010.html#comment-2424 Dope!! where’s the review??

]]>
By: Anonymous https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/05/yes-snowboards-2009-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-2422 Thu, 07 May 2009 22:05:00 +0000 http://shayboarder.plan81.com/2009/05/yes-snowboards-2009-2010.html#comment-2422 Those look sick! Stylish and classy. Too bad they probably won’t make a wide 🙁

]]>