define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);
As for being “Retail friendly,” you mean “appealing to the average snowboarding customer,” right? I can see the logic, but I would hope someone could find a way to appeal to a smaller segment of the market and still make money. In my mind, the boards that “stand out” are the ones that are clean, since they are so few. My current board is a Salomon Special ’08. Black a few subtle lines, and an unfortunate small bling-thing graphic of a hand sticking out of a wrist with a folded sawbuck. Some of the Arbor models stand out, too, for simplicity. The WX is OK but it looks like it’s trying to emulate the German cross.
What do you mean by “clean topsheet versions” of boards that are snapped up by dealers? Simple, minimal-graphics boards that you sell just to dealers? Why do they want it? Doesn’t that suggest there’s a market, however small, for minimalism? Could you make a few more and sell those directly on the web? I know that you’ve got to keep your retailers happy, so you may not want to sell a lot of stuff directly.
I’m still confused about the costs of graphics. I guess you’re saying that the process of getting the graphics created and put into place is substantial but the cost of the artist, specifically, is fairly small. Did I get that right?
Thanks again for an interesting conversationn.
]]>We pay graphic artists, we do the majority in house, this cost is not factored into the board retail or factory cost. Overall to our company it’s a pretty penny, the factory cost is the lacquers, inks, screening, sublimation, heatstamps,sidewall prints and crap like that. It’s not like it’s over the top and this is compared to single factors in pricing like the core, fiberglass/epoxy, base, etc. Those 3 things cost more when combined, but individually cost a little less than the graphics. themselves.
]]>Shay, I don’t care for some of the graphics on Flow boards, either. I love Flow bindings, but I did think the 24K gold model is over the top.
And you’re right, even I care about graphics–but not in the way that most people don’t. In a marketplace, the majority rule most of the time. I’m holding out hope that in time someone will find a market niche by producing outstanding products with clean topsheets and bases. I thought my next board was going to be an Arbor, but I think I saw on your site here that they’re chasing after the bad art trend.
Hope you don’t mind, Shay, here’s my original post on graphics, five years ago:
http://graysontrays.com/blog/2004_10_01_archive.html
And my latest:
http://graysontrays.com/blog/2009/09/how-much-do-those-graphics-cost.html
We’ve also talked about it on the discussion board, such as here:
http://www.graysontrays.com/bb/viewtopic.php?t=953&sid=7c2e73de341eee85c7a765e467debada
So Eric, if you’re listening ….
]]>It is interesting to hear the cost of graphics. Each year they change but typically the board doesn’t.
]]>Are graphics really “the most expensive part” of making a board?
]]>