define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true); define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true); Comments on: 2009-2010 Binding Review https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/10/2009-2010-binding-review.html The World of Snowboarding Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:17:26 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2 By: Shay https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/10/2009-2010-binding-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-13730 Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:17:26 +0000 http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=7576#comment-13730 Thank you Woogie! That’s great to hear you enjoy the site and the reviews, definitely makes my hard work pay off to hear that. Thanks!

]]>
By: Woogie https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/10/2009-2010-binding-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-13724 Fri, 11 Dec 2009 04:06:51 +0000 http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=7576#comment-13724 I’m 53 year old freerider who works in the industry and just wanted to say I enjoy reading your site. Your reviews are honest and that’s hard to find.I ride a TRS 159 and a 2010 168 Jones Rossi.When Ineed to find out about a product yours is the 1st site I go to.My 7 year old Grandson makes the 3rd generation of Riders. keep it real (old hippie saying)

]]>
By: Shay https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/10/2009-2010-binding-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-11686 Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:41:15 +0000 http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=7576#comment-11686 Thanks Joe for bringing that comment back to my attention.

Fn, comparing them to my regular forces from last year they are a bit lighter and the highback is different in how it flexes, but they are stiffer than my old forces and more responsive. Supposedly the binding is the stiffest in the line now and but personally it doesn’t feel overly stiff to me, I like riding in them a lot.

Review will be coming up soon on them 🙂

]]>
By: Joe https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/10/2009-2010-binding-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-11684 Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:29:59 +0000 http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=7576#comment-11684 Bump!
(on that last question from Fn)

]]>
By: Fn https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/10/2009-2010-binding-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-10615 Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:00:04 +0000 http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=7576#comment-10615 Hi!

Can you compare the force sl with the normal forces please? How do they compare regarding stiffness? Thx!

]]>
By: Fn https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/10/2009-2010-binding-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-10609 Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:22:02 +0000 http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=7576#comment-10609 Hey Shay,

You say you are riding the SL’s now, how do they compare to the regular forces?

I’m looking for a stiff responsive binding, is there much difference between the two regarding stiffness?

]]>
By: Shay https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/10/2009-2010-binding-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-9341 Mon, 12 Oct 2009 06:06:20 +0000 http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=7576#comment-9341 Quezz, with Rome I rode test bindings so I am waiting till the November demos to ride them again and put out the review.

]]>
By: Quezz https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/10/2009-2010-binding-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-9337 Mon, 12 Oct 2009 05:17:26 +0000 http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=7576#comment-9337 No Rome bindings this year?

]]>
By: Ethan https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/10/2009-2010-binding-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-9042 Thu, 08 Oct 2009 06:20:00 +0000 http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=7576#comment-9042 Union Contacts

]]>
By: JT https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/10/2009-2010-binding-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-8962 Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:12:46 +0000 http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=7576#comment-8962 I agree Paris, I’m stoked to hear how the Shakas work out myself. Definitely an interesting concept if anything.

]]>