define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);
Comments on: 2009-2010 Binding Review
https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/10/2009-2010-binding-review.html
The World of SnowboardingFri, 11 Dec 2009 05:17:26 +0000
hourly
1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2
By: Shay
https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/10/2009-2010-binding-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-13730
Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:17:26 +0000http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=7576#comment-13730Thank you Woogie! That’s great to hear you enjoy the site and the reviews, definitely makes my hard work pay off to hear that. Thanks!
]]>
By: Woogie
https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/10/2009-2010-binding-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-13724
Fri, 11 Dec 2009 04:06:51 +0000http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=7576#comment-13724I’m 53 year old freerider who works in the industry and just wanted to say I enjoy reading your site. Your reviews are honest and that’s hard to find.I ride a TRS 159 and a 2010 168 Jones Rossi.When Ineed to find out about a product yours is the 1st site I go to.My 7 year old Grandson makes the 3rd generation of Riders. keep it real (old hippie saying)
]]>
By: Shay
https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/10/2009-2010-binding-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-11686
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:41:15 +0000http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=7576#comment-11686Thanks Joe for bringing that comment back to my attention.
Fn, comparing them to my regular forces from last year they are a bit lighter and the highback is different in how it flexes, but they are stiffer than my old forces and more responsive. Supposedly the binding is the stiffest in the line now and but personally it doesn’t feel overly stiff to me, I like riding in them a lot.
Review will be coming up soon on them 🙂
]]>
By: Joe
https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/10/2009-2010-binding-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-11684
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:29:59 +0000http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=7576#comment-11684Bump!
(on that last question from Fn)
]]>
By: Fn
https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/10/2009-2010-binding-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-10615
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:00:04 +0000http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=7576#comment-10615Hi!
Can you compare the force sl with the normal forces please? How do they compare regarding stiffness? Thx!
You say you are riding the SL’s now, how do they compare to the regular forces?
I’m looking for a stiff responsive binding, is there much difference between the two regarding stiffness?
]]>
By: Shay
https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/10/2009-2010-binding-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-9341
Mon, 12 Oct 2009 06:06:20 +0000http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=7576#comment-9341Quezz, with Rome I rode test bindings so I am waiting till the November demos to ride them again and put out the review.
]]>
By: Quezz
https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/10/2009-2010-binding-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-9337
Mon, 12 Oct 2009 05:17:26 +0000http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=7576#comment-9337No Rome bindings this year?
]]>
By: Ethan
https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/10/2009-2010-binding-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-9042
Thu, 08 Oct 2009 06:20:00 +0000http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=7576#comment-9042Union Contacts
]]>
By: JT
https://www.shayboarder.com/2009/10/2009-2010-binding-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-8962
Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:12:46 +0000http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=7576#comment-8962I agree Paris, I’m stoked to hear how the Shakas work out myself. Definitely an interesting concept if anything.
]]>