define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Snowboard Review: 12-13 GNU Ladies Choice C2 BTX	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shayboarder.com/2012/02/snowboard-review-12-13-gnu-ladies-choice.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2012/02/snowboard-review-12-13-gnu-ladies-choice.html</link>
	<description>The World of Snowboarding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:51:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kirsten		</title>
		<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2012/02/snowboard-review-12-13-gnu-ladies-choice.html/comment-page-1#comment-401001</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirsten]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=19703#comment-401001</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can you (or anyone) tell me the difference between this board and the limited edition one that GNU ran in the fall or 2011? The graphic is of a tree on top. I just want to know if any of the technology is different.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you (or anyone) tell me the difference between this board and the limited edition one that GNU ran in the fall or 2011? The graphic is of a tree on top. I just want to know if any of the technology is different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Shay		</title>
		<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2012/02/snowboard-review-12-13-gnu-ladies-choice.html/comment-page-1#comment-253412</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 08:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=19703#comment-253412</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Liz, the Ladies Choice is a tad stiffer than the Ollie Pop. The Flex scale is the same for GNU/Lib/Roxy. Ollie Pop is a bit softer, freestyle while the Ladies Choice is more power/pop/stiffer freestyle]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz, the Ladies Choice is a tad stiffer than the Ollie Pop. The Flex scale is the same for GNU/Lib/Roxy. Ollie Pop is a bit softer, freestyle while the Ladies Choice is more power/pop/stiffer freestyle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Liz		</title>
		<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2012/02/snowboard-review-12-13-gnu-ladies-choice.html/comment-page-1#comment-228779</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 20:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=19703#comment-228779</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Would you say this board is comparable to the Roxy Ollie Pop? Or would you say the ollie pop is a softer, more park oriented board?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you say this board is comparable to the Roxy Ollie Pop? Or would you say the ollie pop is a softer, more park oriented board?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Shay		</title>
		<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2012/02/snowboard-review-12-13-gnu-ladies-choice.html/comment-page-1#comment-228449</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 06:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=19703#comment-228449</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Rhetty, no problem at all :) For the trilogies, some upgrades in the straps but honestly I think you&#039;d be fine with the 2012 version they are still decent and you&#039;ll get a better deal unless she really needs the 2013 models. Forces are the men&#039;s version so you don&#039;t need those unless she has bigger feet.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rhetty, no problem at all 🙂 For the trilogies, some upgrades in the straps but honestly I think you&#8217;d be fine with the 2012 version they are still decent and you&#8217;ll get a better deal unless she really needs the 2013 models. Forces are the men&#8217;s version so you don&#8217;t need those unless she has bigger feet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rhetty		</title>
		<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2012/02/snowboard-review-12-13-gnu-ladies-choice.html/comment-page-1#comment-228012</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rhetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 10:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=19703#comment-228012</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[AWESOME!, thanks alot ... shayboarder delivers again!, Legend.

Hey 1 more question if thats cool (then ill leave you alone), turns out I can get a saaaaweet deal on the 2012 Ladies Choice, and 2012 Trilogy bindings. Question is has much changed from 2012 Trilogy to 2013, i.e. are the 2012 Trilogies still decent?, or should I maybe looke at Forces or another brand even?

Ta.


Purchases tomorrow!

Cheers R]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AWESOME!, thanks alot &#8230; shayboarder delivers again!, Legend.</p>
<p>Hey 1 more question if thats cool (then ill leave you alone), turns out I can get a saaaaweet deal on the 2012 Ladies Choice, and 2012 Trilogy bindings. Question is has much changed from 2012 Trilogy to 2013, i.e. are the 2012 Trilogies still decent?, or should I maybe looke at Forces or another brand even?</p>
<p>Ta.</p>
<p>Purchases tomorrow!</p>
<p>Cheers R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Shay		</title>
		<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2012/02/snowboard-review-12-13-gnu-ladies-choice.html/comment-page-1#comment-227392</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 06:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=19703#comment-227392</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[rhetty, glad to help out! For size probably the 151 would suit her the best, the 148 is on the smaller size but depends on her preferences. Between the two boards, the B-street is definitely softer and much more playful while the ladies choice is more mountain/park/all mountain ride everything. In terms of comparing to the ultrafear, I think the ladies choice might be the most similar. The B-street would be in between that and the horrorscope. But hard to say how she&#039;ll interpret the ladies choice. I think personally it&#039;s the better board for her, more all around riding and still very playful. The Bstreet would be a lot softer so depends if she wants to go softer more playful everywhere. Trilogies are a good choice for 2013.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rhetty, glad to help out! For size probably the 151 would suit her the best, the 148 is on the smaller size but depends on her preferences. Between the two boards, the B-street is definitely softer and much more playful while the ladies choice is more mountain/park/all mountain ride everything. In terms of comparing to the ultrafear, I think the ladies choice might be the most similar. The B-street would be in between that and the horrorscope. But hard to say how she&#8217;ll interpret the ladies choice. I think personally it&#8217;s the better board for her, more all around riding and still very playful. The Bstreet would be a lot softer so depends if she wants to go softer more playful everywhere. Trilogies are a good choice for 2013.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rhetty		</title>
		<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2012/02/snowboard-review-12-13-gnu-ladies-choice.html/comment-page-1#comment-227266</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rhetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 01:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=19703#comment-227266</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey! and Help!

Getting a new board for the wife, and I have my choices down to the Ladies Choice or a B-street ... my wife is 154 lbs and 5.7 (boot size 8.5) and an intermediate to advanced rider (i.e. she rides fast but likes a playful board, adn soem small jibs and jumps etc). I was thinking the 148.5 or the 151.5?

Which do you reckon is the better option board wise? (she has come of a large traditional camber and also loved riding my ultrafear, loved the playfulness). I was all set on the bstreet but just worried it might be a bit loose for her? i.e. that the ladies choice will be more like my ultrafear.

Was also going to team it with the new 2013 Union Trilogy&#039;s (unless there is a beter choice?).

Keen to buy this ASAP so if you can let me know woudl be awesome.



Cheers R]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! and Help!</p>
<p>Getting a new board for the wife, and I have my choices down to the Ladies Choice or a B-street &#8230; my wife is 154 lbs and 5.7 (boot size 8.5) and an intermediate to advanced rider (i.e. she rides fast but likes a playful board, adn soem small jibs and jumps etc). I was thinking the 148.5 or the 151.5?</p>
<p>Which do you reckon is the better option board wise? (she has come of a large traditional camber and also loved riding my ultrafear, loved the playfulness). I was all set on the bstreet but just worried it might be a bit loose for her? i.e. that the ladies choice will be more like my ultrafear.</p>
<p>Was also going to team it with the new 2013 Union Trilogy&#8217;s (unless there is a beter choice?).</p>
<p>Keen to buy this ASAP so if you can let me know woudl be awesome.</p>
<p>Cheers R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>