define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true); define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true); Comments on: Snowboard Review: 13-14 Lib Tech Trice C2 BTX https://www.shayboarder.com/2013/02/snowboard-review-13-14-lib-tech-trice-c2-btx.html The World of Snowboarding Sun, 02 Dec 2018 07:16:53 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2 By: Alypse https://www.shayboarder.com/2013/02/snowboard-review-13-14-lib-tech-trice-c2-btx.html/comment-page-1#comment-487495 Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:44:51 +0000 http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=24420#comment-487495 Did you find any difference between T.Rice 2013 and T.Rice 2012, or only new graphics?

]]>
By: Shay https://www.shayboarder.com/2013/02/snowboard-review-13-14-lib-tech-trice-c2-btx.html/comment-page-1#comment-472330 Sat, 02 Mar 2013 18:00:32 +0000 http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=24420#comment-472330 In reply to Defadal.

Awesome on the new board! For the conditions you’ll be riding, the board how it handles and your weight, you’d be fine on the 157. Definitely if you had more powder, deeper conditions I’d maybe think to size up but you’ll be fine on the 157cm. It’ll handle all of the mountain and it does ride longer than you think.

]]>
By: Defadal https://www.shayboarder.com/2013/02/snowboard-review-13-14-lib-tech-trice-c2-btx.html/comment-page-1#comment-470473 Thu, 28 Feb 2013 17:02:06 +0000 http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=24420#comment-470473 Hey. I am planning on purchasing this board. Though, I am having a hard time deciding between the 157 and 161.5 boards. I am an intermediate rider, 6’0 and 180 lbs. I will mostly ride east coast mountains in Vermont. Most of my days will be on the slopes with little time in the park. I have heard that this board rides a bit longer than its size, and wonder if the 161.5 would be too long. What do you think?

]]>