define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);
Comments on: Snowboard Review: 13-14 Lib Tech Trice C2 BTX
https://www.shayboarder.com/2013/02/snowboard-review-13-14-lib-tech-trice-c2-btx.html
The World of SnowboardingSun, 02 Dec 2018 07:16:53 +0000
hourly
1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2
By: Alypse
https://www.shayboarder.com/2013/02/snowboard-review-13-14-lib-tech-trice-c2-btx.html/comment-page-1#comment-487495
Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:44:51 +0000http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=24420#comment-487495Did you find any difference between T.Rice 2013 and T.Rice 2012, or only new graphics?
]]>
By: Shay
https://www.shayboarder.com/2013/02/snowboard-review-13-14-lib-tech-trice-c2-btx.html/comment-page-1#comment-472330
Sat, 02 Mar 2013 18:00:32 +0000http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=24420#comment-472330In reply to Defadal.
Awesome on the new board! For the conditions you’ll be riding, the board how it handles and your weight, you’d be fine on the 157. Definitely if you had more powder, deeper conditions I’d maybe think to size up but you’ll be fine on the 157cm. It’ll handle all of the mountain and it does ride longer than you think.
]]>
By: Defadal
https://www.shayboarder.com/2013/02/snowboard-review-13-14-lib-tech-trice-c2-btx.html/comment-page-1#comment-470473
Thu, 28 Feb 2013 17:02:06 +0000http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=24420#comment-470473Hey. I am planning on purchasing this board. Though, I am having a hard time deciding between the 157 and 161.5 boards. I am an intermediate rider, 6’0 and 180 lbs. I will mostly ride east coast mountains in Vermont. Most of my days will be on the slopes with little time in the park. I have heard that this board rides a bit longer than its size, and wonder if the 161.5 would be too long. What do you think?
]]>