define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>_REVIEWS2009-2010_BOARDS &#8211; Shayboarder.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.shayboarder.com/category/_reviews2009-2010_boards/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.shayboarder.com</link>
	<description>The World of Snowboarding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 19:06:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Grand Prix Copper: Men&#8217;s &#038; Women&#8217;s Superpipe Finals</title>
		<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2011/12/grand-prix-copper-mens-womens-superpipe-finals-2.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 07:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riding Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[_REVIEWS2009-2010_BOARDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copper Grand Prix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copper Halfpipe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copper Mountain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copper Resort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copper Superpipe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand Prix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand Prix Copper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand Prix Superpipe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand Prix Superpipe Finals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gretchen Bleiler Copper Grand Prix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelly Clark Copper Grand Prix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Men's Superpipe Finals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Superpipe Finals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=18779</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A couple weeks ago I was watching Copper put the finishing touch on their always perfect Superpipe and now I&#8221;m seeing the best riders in the world completely dominant it. Today was the Grand Prix Superpipe Finals at Copper Mountain in Colorado. The best pipe riders throwing down for their chance at winning cash, getting points and proving their skills in the stunt ditch. In previous years at Grand Prix, the weather has never cooperated but this year it was a beautiful December day with bluebird skies, no winds and great conditions. I had to chance to meet up with Taylor from AlpineReplay as I was on my way to the truck to get my camera gear. Then it was time to head up to the Superpipe to get some shots and catch the action of the finals when they started. It was a busy Saturday on the slopes and the bars at the base of the mountain offered up perfect views of the action. Plenty of people lined the pipe fence to see their favorite riders go big. Scotty Lago on his way up the pipe [singlepic id=12692 w=1000 h=667 float=] The women were first to hit the pipe [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shay&#8217;s Best of 09-10</title>
		<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/05/shays-best-of-09-10.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/05/shays-best-of-09-10.html#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 14:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[_REVIEWS2009-2010_BINDINGS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[_REVIEWS2009-2010_BOARDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of 09-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best of 09-10 snowboard bindings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best of 09-10 snowboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of list]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shay's best of list]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=11464</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Now that the 09-10 season has come to an end (with the exception of this summer at Mt Hood) I figured it was finally time to bring back the best of 09-10.  The best of list is my way of commending boards I enjoyed riding this year, it&#8217;s not a board test but just a two thumbs up kind of list. For the 2009-2010 season I ended up riding over 70 snowboards, 64 of which were made into reviews.  Of those 64 snowboards, 15 were women&#8217;s boards and 49 were men&#8217;s boards.  I ended up riding 15 different bindings, 9 of which were women&#8217;s and 6 were men&#8217;s bindings.  The majority of the gear reviewed was done during demo days around Colorado. These boards came from the 2009-2010 snowboard reviews section on my blog which goes more in-depth on each review. [singlepic id=9028 w=300 h=300 float=] I originally published the best of 09-10 in November but wanted to re-touch on this list, some stayed the same but there were some changes to the list. All-around Board Men&#8217;s: The Indoor Survival still remains the do-it all board for 09-10 for handling everywhere on the mountain. Women&#8217;s: The Never Summer Lotus-R is [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/05/shays-best-of-09-10.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snowboard Review: 09-10 Burton Custom V-rocker</title>
		<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-burton-custom.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-burton-custom.html#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[_REVIEWS2009-2010_BOARDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009-2010 Snowboard Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burton Custom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burton Custom V-rocker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burton Custom V-rocker Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snowboard Review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=9231</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Location: Loveland, CO Snow Conditions: Hardpacked to icy conditions on the mountain. Setup: I rode the Burton Custom with Burton Lexa bindings and Bonfire Geo boots. Size: 156cm. First Impression: The v-rocker upgrade finally enticed me to check it the new Custom and see what the fuss was. Weight: Average Flex: The custom is in the middle of the road on flex, it wasn&#8217;t a softer flex but not stiffer either.  Longitudinally it seemed stiffer which gave it more stability and really let it handle turns with ease.  Torsionally there was good flex and with the rocker really easy to roll over onto edge for a quicker response than I was expecting. The softer nose/tail makes it so you can play on it when you aren&#8217;t charging.  It&#8217;s not a soft noodly board and I found I could still get some good The V-rocker is a 3 stage rocker, center rocker between the feet and then rocker outside of the foot that lift up the tip and tail of the board. Turning: Riding the custom was very smooth and predictable when it came to turning down the mountain.  I had no problems with initiating a turn, holding it through the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-burton-custom.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snowboard Review: 09-10 Nitro Rook</title>
		<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-nitro-rook.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-nitro-rook.html#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[_REVIEWS2009-2010_BOARDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009-2010 Snowboard Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nitro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nitro Rook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nitro Rook Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nitro Snowboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nitro Snowboards Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snowboard Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Camber]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=9235</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Location: Loveland, CO Snow Conditions: Hardpacked to icy conditions on the mountain. Setup: I rode the Nitro Rook with Raiden Eris bindings and Bonfire Geo boots. Size: 154cm. First Impression: A bit stiffer than I was expecting but good pop and all around seems like your typical park board. Weight: Average Flex: The rook was deceiving at first, it seemed like a stiff board and then once I got it riding it was stiffer underfoot to the nose and tail, but in between the bindings softer flex so really easy to maneuver and a more forgiving flex than I was expecting.  The combination of stiffer nose/tail made it a bit more difficult to get some high press action going on. Turning: I found the really short radius quick turns were the best and most responsive with the easy quick edge to edge and the softer torsional flex.  When I tried to hold the board into longer drawn out turns it wasn&#8217;t as fun and seemed to require more effort to remain stable through them. Stable: It was decent at higher speeds, not the most stable board I&#8217;ve ridden in that size but it didn&#8217;t buck me either.  It handled shorter [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-nitro-rook.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snowboard Review: 09-10 Rome Agent</title>
		<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-rome-agent.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-rome-agent.html#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[_REVIEWS2009-2010_BOARDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[09-10 Rome Agent review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009-2010 Snowboard Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rome Agent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rome Agent Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rome Snowboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rome Snowboards Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snowboard Review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=9199</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Location: Loveland, CO Snow Conditions: Hardpacked to icy conditions on the mountain. Setup: I rode the Rome Agent with Union Force bindings and Bonfire Geo boots. Size: 154cm. First Impression: The agent is a classic and while I couldn&#8217;t ride the 1985 version it was good to get back on a classic ride. Weight: Average Flex: The agent isn&#8217;t a noodle by any means and longitudinally it&#8217;s a tad stiffer than it is torsionally, the torsional flex really allows you to get quick response and maneuverability from it on the mountain.  Rome added reverse-V carbon stringers in the tail to give you more pop and that makes it a tad stiffer.  I tried to press both the nose and tail, found the nose easier to press and butter with. Turning: It was easy to ininiate turns on the agent (the bevel helped with not catching edges) and once on edge, it held each turn with no problem.  I was able to ride longer S turns with easy stability down the mountain and if I needed quick response from shorter turns, no problem there either.  It carved the icy spots on the mountain without slipping out and I felt really comfortable [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-rome-agent.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snowboard Review: 09-10 K2 Slayblade</title>
		<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-k2-slayblade.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-k2-slayblade.html#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[_REVIEWS2009-2010_BOARDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009-2010 Snowboard Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K2 Slayblade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K2 Slayblade Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K2 Snowboarding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K2 Snowboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slayblade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snowboard Review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=9201</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Location: Loveland, CO Snow Conditions: Hardpacked to icy conditions on the mountain. Setup: I rode the K2 Slayblade with K2 Auto Agogo bindings and Bonfire Geo boots. Size: 156cm. First Impression: The eco pop won me over, lets see if I feel the same about the men&#8217;s model for flatline technology. Weight: Lighter than average Flex: Overall it&#8217;s on the stiffer end of the spectrum, light stiffer freeride board meant to charge.  The nose and tail are stiffer in flex and I found it to be a bit torsionally stiffer than I was expecting which made it a bit slower edge to edge but really stable once on edge it charged the mountain. The K2 Slayblade has flatline technology which is zero camber, flat board which delivers stability and versatility.  It&#8217;s a good medium between camber and rocker. Turning: Longer drawn out S turns were the best on this board, it really held  a carve throughout the entire turn.  Shorter turns I found it a bit more difficult for me from the torsional stiffness to get the quick response out of.  I really like K2&#8217;s hyper progressive sidecut because it&#8217;s easy to get into and out of turns but when [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-k2-slayblade.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snowboard Review: 09-10 Capita Sierrascope FK</title>
		<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-capita-sierrascope-fk.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-capita-sierrascope-fk.html#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[_REVIEWS2009-2010_BOARDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009-2010 Snowboard Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capita Sierrascope FK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capita Sierrascope FK review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capita Snowboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sierra Snowboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sierrascope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sierrascope Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sierrasnowboards.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snowboard Review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=9186</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Location: Steamboat, CO Snow Conditions: Hardpacked conditions on the mountain. Setup: I rode the Capita Sierrascope with Union bastardized bindings and Bonfire Geo boots. Size: 152cm. First Impression: The sierrascope is a collaboration between sierra snowboards and capita snowboards, sometimes collabs can make a product that is a great deal and a great ride&#8230;this is one of them. Weight: Average Flex: Just like the indoor, the sierracope has a softer nose and tail with stiffer flex between the bindings from the carbon X stringers.  It makes it really stable between the feet and a tad playful on the nose and tail with the help of the flat kick.  Stiffer torsional flex which I found doesn&#8217;t make it to difficult to go edge to edge but helps with the stability when riding and especially in halfpipe.  It&#8217;s not as playful as the horrorscope or ultrafear by any means.  Capita&#8217;s Flat Kick technology had zero camber between the bindings and then kicks up towards the nose and tail. Turning: It&#8217;s easy to get on edge and despite the stiffness between foot it doesn&#8217;t make you work harder to get it into turns.  Turn initiation is super easy and doesn&#8217;t throw any surprises [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-capita-sierrascope-fk.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snowboard Review: 09-10 Forum Youngblood Chillydog</title>
		<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-forum-youngblood-chillydog.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-forum-youngblood-chillydog.html#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 05:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[_REVIEWS2009-2010_BOARDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forum chillydog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forum Snowboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forum Youngblood Chillydog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forum Youngblood review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snowboard review 2009-2010 snowboard review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=9203</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Location: Loveland, CO Snow Conditions: Hardpacked to icy conditions on the mountain. Setup: I rode the Forum Youngblood with Forum Shaka bindings and Bonfire Geo boots. Size: 156cm. First Impression: Woah, softer and really feeling the connection between bindings to board&#8230;a bit too connected. Weight: average Flex: The Youngblood is a softer flexing park board throughout the board and the combination of the shaka&#8217;s was a bit too much flexing for me in how the board handled the mountain.  In the park it excelled for flex, easy to press, butter, ollie, pop and slide without any worries.  The chillydog rocker is a continuous rocker from tip to tail and on the youngblood it made for a very soft, playful park board. Turning: One of the first turns I did with the youngblood was carve uphill with it to see how it flexed and carved into the snow, immediately it bucked me out when I held the edge which I think was the softer flex and something else.  On the carves it didn&#8217;t hold the edge, skidded turns were much better but carved turns it wasn&#8217;t as good holding in them.  I ended up being a bit more careful with turns [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-forum-youngblood-chillydog.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snowboard Review: 09-10 Arbor Push</title>
		<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-arbor-push.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-arbor-push.html#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 06:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[_REVIEWS2009-2010_BOARDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009-2010 Snowboard Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbor Push Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbor Snowboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Push Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snowboard Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's snowboard review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=9176</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Location: Loveland, CO Snow Conditions: Hardpacked to icy conditions on the mountain. Setup: I rode the Arbor Push with Union Force bindings and Bonfire Geo boots. Size: 156cm. First Impression: Camber is like coming home, you know it&#8217;s good for you and you know exactly how it will react to you. Weight: tad heavier than average Flex: The push is one of the stiffer women&#8217;s freeride boards and meant for an aggressive female rider.  Longitudinally stiffer with a softer nose and stiffer tail, torsionally a tad softer so you can get the board quickly from edge to edge and engage the turn easier than expected.  But still not an easy women&#8217;s board, overall a stiffer board and compares to some other stiffer women&#8217;s freeride boards for the mountain. Turning: I hadn&#8217;t been on camber in a while but I found the push not too difficult to engage the edge and get into a turn quickly.  Once in the turn, you feel stable and no problem engaging the edge and when you come out of the turn you&#8217;re increasing speed than when you went into the turn.  It&#8217;s a fast board and carves on a dime, but also no room for [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-arbor-push.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snowboard Review: 09-10 Ride Machete</title>
		<link>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-ride-machete.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-ride-machete.html#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[_REVIEWS2009-2010_BOARDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lowrize rocker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ride lowrize rocker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ride machete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ride machete review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ride Snowboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ride Snowboards review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shayboarder.com/?p=9139</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Location: Loveland, CO Snow Conditions: Hardpacked to icy conditions on the mountain. Setup: I rode the Ride Machete with Ride Sigma Movement bindings and Bonfire Geo boots. Size: 158cm. First Impression: Finally getting to ride the machete, I heard this board can cut down trees. Weight: Lighter than average Flex: Overall it isn&#8217;t a soft board, as a park board it&#8217;s on the stiffer side and I think the majority of stiffness felt that way from the carbon array 3 they use in the board.  The machete felt stiffer underfoot and out to the tip and tail with a softer torsional flex between the bindings.  That helps give it a more stable feeling when riding and you still have a easy board to torsionally turn and it&#8217;s not too difficult to press/butter on the nose and tail.  The Ride machete has lowrize rocker which is a flat between the bindings and then rockers out to lift the contact points.  The best thing about lowrize is the rocker isn&#8217;t insane, it&#8217;s very mellow and no adjustment to ride. Turning: The lowrize sidecut really makes for a smooth predictable turn and that&#8217;s what I like best about Ride, there&#8217;s no worries on [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.shayboarder.com/2010/01/snowboard-review-09-10-ride-machete.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>